![]() However if you are going to use a separate screen just to show temps and stats, you might as well go whole hog and use the screen for other things like chat, discord, YouTube, reading game guides etc. G-Story 15.6” HDR QLED Portable Gaming Monitor (GSQ56SD) = Php 10,495Īdmittedly these are expensive, just like buying a second monitor.G-STORY 13.3" QHD PORTABLE GAMING MONITOR (GS133QR) = Php 9,995.G-STORY 15.6" HDR FREE SYNC MONITOR (GSW56FM) = Php 8,995.It's open source, and I'm thinking of adapting the program myself, but for now I don't have time.DataBlitz has those G-Story USB monitors ranging in size from 12.9-inches to 15.6-inches: Hopefully these weaknesses will be resolved in the future. CPU, GPU and HDD temperatures are implemented as good as they can be though. Like all programs of this class, its motherboard monitor reading are all over the place and highly inaccurate on most motherboards.It doesn't have temperature driven fan speed curves. It has fan control, but the fan control is limited to setting a fixed speed.It asks for administrative privileges on start up with a UAC prompt.However, this program has three weaknesses: Some software and BIOSes use the readings between the thresholds for controlling the fan speed more smoothly, this may or may not work well, but the official datasheets for Intel CPUs prescribe very simple threshold based thermal management.Īs for software, I mostly like Open Hardware Monitor. For AMD CPUs none of this information is public, and I have no idea what's possible on those, other than that they do also have throttling when Tjmax is reached. ![]() Some people speculate that they are also used for Turbo Boost, but in my experience the CPU will Turbo Boost until it reaches Tjmax and starts to severely throttle. The thresholds on Intel CPUs are used for switching the CPU fan between high and low speed and thermal throttling if the CPU is near Tjmax. In general, the higher the temperature, the more accurate the reading. ![]() Most AMD, and earlier Intel CPUs use a table/formula with estimates that work well for some CPUs, but gives crazy readings on others. Only Intel Core based CPUs have somewhat accurate readings in my experience. These sensors are made for fan/thermal management and are basically meant to be used with one or two threshold values, despite appearances they do not provide accurate readings between these threshold. Second, the readings from sensors like the thermal junctions in CPUs and GPUs can be highly inaccurate. Hopefully in the future everything will either support IPMI, or some other simple standard will be developed. This results in voltage and temperature readings that make no sense at all. However, there is no standard for how these chips are connected, and increasingly every motherboard has its own connections. There are a couple of monitoring chips that most manufacturers use, monitoring software reads back the values from these chips using direct memory mapped I/O or I2C communication. These limitations are fundamental, and no software can truly work around them.įirst, there is no standard for motherboard monitoring (other than IPMI, which only (expensive) servers support). There are some important limitation to monitoring the temperatures of your PCs components with their integrated sensors.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |